No Duty To Bring Out Cite Of P2p User, Says Frankfurt Court

According to Heise Online the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt on Midweek overturned a lower courtroom social club that the elevate of an meshwork user who operated a music server via a High German provider had to live on made known to a music firm. The courtroom said:

"An meshwork access provider is non principally obliged to break the elevate too address of an meshwork user who offers downloads of music files on the internet, thence violating the copyrights or other rights of 3rd parties".

The Court maintained that a provider alone supplies technical access to the meshwork but does non to a greater extent than oftentimes than non accept whatever obligation to inspect the information beingness sent through its network. Rather, providers are alone required to block access when they larn of illegal content. Providers produce not, however, accept to render information nearly their customers since the providers accept non themselves infringed whatever copyright or aided too abetted whatever infringement.

P2P - peachy for users, but the courts aren't certainly how to grip it

Last yr the Higher Regional Court of Munich handed downwardly a similar ruling: providers produce non accept to break user information if at that spot is argue to believe that an FTP server is beingness used to infringe copyright. The Appeals Court granted the asking of an meshwork provider who wanted to appeal a ruling of the Regional Court of Munich I. However, the Regional Court of Hamburg ruled only earlier these events that copyright owners tin flame need information nearly the identity of a client to whom certainly dynamic IP addresses are assigned inwards diverse sessions inwards social club to prosecute possible illegal downloads past times an access provider.

worries that inconsistencies betwixt the procedural too evidential rules employed past times courts inwards dissimilar countries, or (as is the illustration here) fifty-fifty inside the same country, tin flame brand the constabulary look uncertain, arbitrary or unfair. He wonders whether the side past times side circular of IP harmonisation should focus to a greater extent than on issues similar this rather than only inwards considering full general norms for protection.

P2P here and here
2P or non 2P here
2B or non 2B here