Manually Operated Car Non An Infringement

In Agilent Technologies Federal Republic of Federal Republic of Germany GmbH v Waters Corp as well as around other (spotted past times LexisNexis' subscription-only All England Direct service) [2004] EWHC 2992 (Ch) Mr Justice Pumfrey, sitting inwards the Patents Court, dismissed what looked similar a pretty far-out patent infringement claim. Agilent owned a patent for to pumping apparatus for the delivery of liquid at high pressure level which could move used inwards high pressure level liquid chromatography columns. Following unreported proceedings inwards which the Court of Appeal ([2002] All ER (D) 152 (May)) held the patent valid as well as infringed, Agilent sued again, alleging that around other Waters' see organisation infringed. This machine operated inwards ‘manual mode’,the operator selecting see book from 4 pre-selectable volumes as well as separately specifying the menses charge per unit of measurement of solvent delivered past times the machine. This machine informed the operator if it could non deliver the specified menses charge per unit of measurement at the book specified but did non automatically alter the range. Waters maintained that automatic performance was essential to the patent, piece Agilent said the claim specified an apparatus which was capable of performing the required adjustment.

Agilent: are they trying to invent a machine for pumping out patent infringement claims?

Mr Justice Pumfrey dismissed the claim, belongings that the patent was non infringed. On its truthful construction, the characterising component subdivision of the patent could exclusively move read equally conferring a monopoly on apparatus capable of operating automatically inwards the fashion described at length inwards the specification. The learned guess expressed the sentiment that it was astonishing that a patent which was based upon a description which exclusively contemplated automatic tracking of the desired menses charge per unit of measurement should move capable of roofing a device inwards which in that place was no such automatic tracking. agrees alongside him. Whether you lot role the one-time Catnic/Improver exam of non-exact infringement or the to a greater extent than sophisticated Kirin-Amgen approach, there's no orbit for stretching this patent's claims to embrace Waters' invention.

What is liquid chromatography? Click here to discovery out