New Effect Of The Eipr

has come upward into possession of a re-create of Jan 2006’s final result of the European Intellectual Property Review.

This month’s final result is rather patenty inwards flavour. The goodies on offering are:

• Pat Treacy too Anna Wray (Bristows) on the prospects for European Union broad criminal sanctions inwards IP cases;
• Fiona Bor (Carpmaels & Ransford) on the exceptions given to patent infringement applied to biotechnology interrogation tools nether s.60(5) of the Patents Act 1977;
• Paul Ganley (Baker & McKenzie) on the Supreme Court's Grokster decison too the futurity of P2P;
• Amanda Warren-Jones (University of Liverpool) on the role of empirical prove inwards judging morality inwards biotechnology patent cases;
• Iris H-Y Chen (University of Leicester) too Will due west Chen (LSE) on IP protection of printed circuit boards;
• Alisa Carter too Simon Aryton (both Bristows) on patent entitlement too Markem v Zipher;
• David Thomas (BUAV too Bindman & Partners) too Georgina Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 Richards (University of Southampton) on the EPO Technical Board of Appeal's conclusion inwards the Oncomouse case;
• Stephen Kon too Thomas Heide (both SJ Berwin) on the Court of Appeal's conclusion inwards the British Horseracing Board v William Hill database case;
• The park collection of notes on national cases too majority review.

This IPKat commends this final result every bit a perfect Bank Holiday Tuesday read.