Apology; Jcl&E Latest Issue

Sorry if you lot got deluged!

Many of you lot who have our e-mail notifications volition bring received fifty or too then notifications of the IPKat's spider web log final night. This appears to bring been the lawsuit of a malfunction of Google's unremarkably reliable notification software. If it's whatever consolation, the IPKat too Merpel were deluged alongside a multiplicity of unwanted emails too, including a large number of Out of Office messages that unremarkably larn filtered out of the e-mail circular system.

Please live on patient alongside the IPKat. He's doing his best and, if anything goes wrong, he suffers exactly similar you!

To have e-mail notifications, delight e-mail the IPKat here or scroll downward to the human foot of the page too create total your e-mail address inwards the picayune Google Groups box.


Another JCL&E emerges

It may live on belatedly December, but the golden leaves too balmy autumnal evenings inwards Oxford are conjured upwardly past times the belatedly appearance of the September 2005 number of Oxford University Press's Journal of Competition Law & Economics.

is a describe of piece of employment solid believer that intellectual holding police solely makes feel against a background of contest police too that it is primarily an economical right, non a moral one. He is saddened, however, that nearly economists either steer clear of IP police or seem to misunderstand its hugely subtle operation. That's why he was too then pleased to run across the critical analysis past times Ariel Katz (right, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto) of the collective direction of copyright. In his abstract Professor Katz writes:

In nearly countries the correct to publicly perform music is non administered individually past times the copyright holders but rather collectively past times performing rights organizations (PROs). The mutual explanation behind the proliferation of collective direction is that roughly aspects of copyright administrations are natural monopolies. It is ofttimes argued that private direction is impracticable or at to the lowest degree non-economical. Collective direction is hence promoted as the nearly efficient method for licensing, monitoring too enforcing those rights. In addition, because the marketplace is a natural monopoly, regulation, rather than an endeavor to foster competition, is idea to live on the optimal regulatory response. This is the outset inwards a serial of ii articles that critically analyse this natural monopoly argument. In this article I fence that the instance for PROs is non as straightforward as it is assumed to be. I demonstrate that many of the underlying terms efficiencies that are attributed to PROs are usually merely assumed and, inwards many cases, could live on as achieved nether less restrictive arrangements.

Biographical details of Ariel Katz here
Full listing of contents of the electrical current number of JCL&E here